top of page
UP
  • alt.text.label.LinkedIn

Improving traveler satisfaction  at Dallas-Fort Worth International  Airport

​

 

​

Dallas-Fort Worth International provides service to 261 destinations on 28 airlines, and boasts more than 200 shops and amenities. DFW is interested in incorporating a feature for travelers to see their estimated wait times into their current app. This would increase traveler satisfaction and increase airport revenue.

OVERVIEW

MY ROLE


I was responsible for making concept mock ups and sketches and collaborating in visual design & presentation. We followed a UX process that that went from competitive analysis to converging on a design, making mock ups & wireframes, building a prototype and conducting design validations.

TIMELINE

2 weeks

 

THE SOLUTION

​

A mobile application with access to real time GPS navigation that enables users to locate and see waiting times for restaurants and other amenities in the area.

TOOLS USED
 

FIGMALOGO.png

Figma

Maze-logo-web.original.png

Maze

  • alt.text.label.LinkedIn

The most connected airport in the world.

The airport comprises 5 separate terminals, American Airlines solely operating out of two of them. Given this configuration, travelers often need to cover large distances between their arriving and connecting flights.

Metrics

  • 62.5 million travelers in 2021

  • 652 Aircracft movements

  • 171.2K Travelers per day

  • 200 restaurants and shops

  • 17,202 acres

​

​

 

Business Goal

​

Dallas-Fort Worth International airport is interested in adding a feature to their app for travelers to see their estimated wait times. This would increase traveler satisfaction and increase airport revenue.

​

User Goal

​

This app is intended for Business Travelers or family vacationers seeking to navigate this complex airport, Improving time-efficiency across airport's sections and establishments. 

The Goals

Users' current experience

Through user interviews, we identified travelers' pain points at airports, what they typically do when they arrive, and what they do while waiting to board.  These interviews revealed that travelers often experienced stress due to delays at different areas of the airport.

 

Some of the insights from our interviews are captured below:

🦆 emoji _watch_.png

 I arrive 1-2 hours before my flight

🦆 emoji _mobile phone with rightwards arrow at left_ (1).png

​ I check-in prior to arrival at the airport. I expect to get notifications about flight status changes through my phone

🦆 emoji _pouting face_.png

I think that security is the most annoying part of the airport

🦆 emoji _worried face_.png

​I get stressed when I have to spend a lot of time in lines

🦆 emoji _spaghetti_.png

I enjoy the restaurants and stores if I have time

🦆 emoji _athletic shoe_.png

​

I need to grab food quickly if my flight is leaving soon

Research Findings 

​

We found that not knowing waiting times contributed to poor traveler satisfaction, so we recommend that DFW expand the wait-time feature and build out the shops/dining section in their current app.  The typical user journey we discovered led us to our problem statement, below.

​

Users need an effective way to be inform about wait times across the airport, so they can manage their time before their flight. 

The Solution

After gathering data, we created personas & task flows to identify the various touch points in the airport's customer service experience. We also created a list of design recommendations addressing the ‘problem space’. 

Provide real-time and efficient security line tracking

Display interactive maps and way-finding graphics

Provide information about documents needed

Help in decision making

Users need detailed, continuously updated information about security lines.

By providing maps to users, we can improve the likelihood of them finding what they're looking for, and decrease the time it takes for them arrive to their desired location.

A system that provides an updated list of security requirements currently in place.

Providing the user them with only the closest options with less waiting times, to reduce the cognitive load & increase efficiency.

Analyzing our competitors

We decided to analyze the services provided by directs competitors through their apps. We also took into consideration Disney World as an indirect competitor, because of the nature of their app, which offers interactive navigational maps to its users.

Denver International Airport

Atlanta International Airport Airport

Disney World

Chicago Midway International Airport

Los Angeles International Aiport

Figpie (3).png
Rectangle 80.png

Only DFW and Disneyland consider wait times as a part of the map

Rectangle 76.png

Other airports do not have option to booking for parking ahead of time, Just DFW.

Rectangle 78.png

Only DFW has mobile ordering

Rectangle 79.png

â…˜ airports have food and shop options

Rectangle 77.png

â…— airports include flight information

Rectangle 81.png

â…— airports include your location on the map

Designing solutions

During this phase "design studio" was the method to brainstorm ideas through sketches. After various design sessions and iterations we came out with 3 user flows for our app's layout.

iterations video
Group 129.png
Group 131.png
Group 132.png
Group 134.png

Challenges along the way

We conducted moderated and unmoderated usability tests. Gathering quantitative and qualitative data, to ensure that the features, layout and overall purpose of our app was intuitive and experienced as intended. However, by observing our pool of 10 users interact with our prototype, we noted some levels of confusion. Some users didn't know what to do next in order to complete certain tasks. 
 

The three tasks participants were asked to complete include:

​
  • Navigate to their airline kiosk to check a bag.
  • Navigate to security and go through the checkpoint.
  • Find somewhere to eat with a short wait time.

Findings:

  • The button 'Proceed to Gate' is confusing to most users.

They usually hit the orange button as a call to action. The placement, color, and text of the button could have all contributed to the participants' confusion.

In our final prototype we rephrased the text in our two buttons. Users will be guided to continue their journey with a primary button, while maintaining the option to go straight to their gate.

Direct success: 77.8% 

Avg Duration: 81.7 seconds

Misclick rate: 46.2%

iPhone 11 Pro Mockup.png

Users are likely to choose the options presented in the primary button; keeping that in consideration we reworded all the primary buttons showed below.

Group 104 (1).png

Direct success 50.1%

Average Duration: 37.5seconds

 Misclick rate: 41.9%

Indirect Success: 66.7%

Average Duration: 37.3 seconds

 Misclick rate: 44.4%

In our final Design we placed the label originally located in the center above the form field, So it's more noticeable to the user where to input flight information.

  • The flight number input was not clear to users as the first step in the journey.

Group 115.png
Prototype

Final Design

Next Steps

  • Continue tracking the level of engagement with the app through more rounds of usability test.

  • Add features including waiting times in charging areas, bathrooms, and family friendly spaces.

  • Add flight time features and individual ticket reminders into the app.

What I learned

  • Think out of the box. Design studio sessions really were effective to shape our app, with all the group members participating we gathered unique ideas that we were able to combine and refine together.

  • To always be open-minded and speak out if you have an idea, the best designs were developed through the inclusion of aspects from multiple other ideas, which were then refined to cover divergent types of needs.

Would you like to see more of my work? 

Get in touch!

Group 207.png
Group 208 (2).png
bottom of page